Comments on: What’s in a name?

By: Tony Arranaga

Tony Arranaga — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:20:47 +0000

I think as time goes on, the general public will define the station names on their own, especially since the location names are already posted on the platforms.

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:10:37 +0000

This was also an impassioned position from an individual at the Friends of Transit conference, as you, Tony, already know. The reasoning that Rick Simonetta, the first CEO of Metro, provided for the current naming convention based on streets, was that the emergency responders wanted it that way, so that they could ensure that they could respond as quickly as possible to citizens’ needs.

Phoenix needs the station names to be streets right now. Why this is is most concretely understood through the emergency responders’ perspective, however the same reasoning applies to Valley citizens in general: The Light Rail is new. The Valley is still defined by the automobile and roads. While there is a small (though larger than expected!) and growing population of us that appreciate, utilize, and understand the benefits of this new transportation alternative, we are still educating the Valley as a whole. We need to educate more people and introduce more Phoenicians to the benefits of transit-based life before we start making station names what non-transit riders would consider to be more “abstract”.

There is an undefinable critical mass, however, at which point the system will benefit from changing station names to major attractions (Arts District, Heard Museum, Central Station, Stadium Station, ASU 1, etc). We’re just not QUITE there yet….

By: Tony Arranaga

Tony Arranaga — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:03:46 +0000

Chloe and Sam – I’m still on the fence. I know METRO in Washington DC has station names and it’s fairly easy to navigate around the city. In comparison, NYC uses street names for some of the stops and it gets a little confusing.

Here in Phoenix, I like the idea of major landmarks as station names, but I kind of feel like the city has bigger problems to deal with at the moment…like budget and service cuts!

By: Sam Mittelsteadt

Sam Mittelsteadt — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:54:30 +0000

Hmm … I don’t know how many people would find the benefit in naming a stop after a nearby mall (Park Central, or the now-defunct Tri-Cities) or a region like Eastlake or Smith-Martin. (I’ve lived here more than a decade and never heard of Eastlake, and I have no idea what Smith-Martin is, either.) Lindley’s concept of streets “not being on many maps” makes me think he’s not looking at the right maps.

And it is indeed Price Road. Loop 101 (the freeway) happens to run alongside it.

But the idea of Convention Center / City Hall is appealing and logical, too.

By: Chloe

Chloe — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:49:08 +0000

I like street names. They’re obvious.